Cultural appropriation can be understood as using intellectual property, traditional knowledge, cultural expressions, or artifacts from someone’s culture without permission. It is most likely to be harmful when the source culture is a group that has been oppressed or exploited in other ways (as with Indigenous Peoples), or when the object of appropriation is particularly sensitive or sacred (Scafidi, 2005). However, it is not always simple to identify when cultural appropriation is occurring.
Here are two examples of learning experiences that use creating poles to understand the nuances of cultural appropriation.
Example 1: Cardboard Box “Totem” Poles
In the learning exchange video series “appropriation,” Susan Dion gives the example of elementary school educators having their students make “totem” poles out of cardboard boxes. She explains that this activity trivializes the importance of poles in Haida culture. Dion compares making totem poles to having children make a model of a Catholic chalice and host and pretending to give and take first communion. This would be clearly recognizable as inappropriate and offensive.
Example 2: Pole Carving
The entire school community at Taylor Park Elementary in Burnaby, B.C. is involved in a new project under the guidance of Indigenous artist Simon James, whose ancestral name is Winadzi. He is from the Kwakwaka’wakw Nation. James is also working with Squamish Nation Elder Sheryl Rivers to honour local teachings and protocol.
Beginning in January, all students from Kindergarten to Grade 7, along with staff, are getting the chance to carve and listen to James’ teachings and storytelling. James created the design after several months of connecting with students, staff and families, who shared their values and stories with him.
See the video below, which also shows the early stages of the work.
In the first example, cultural appropriation occurred for the following reasons:
Poles have a spiritual significance, which was not honoured in the activity.
- Indigenous communities that created totem poles have been exploited through colonialism in many other ways.
- They were not involved in the assignment to make poles, and they did not grant permission to the teacher to make poles.
- The creating of the poles was not interwoven with Indigenous approaches but was a one-off assignment within a predominantly Westernized approach.
In the second example, making poles was a respectful activity for the following reasons:
- Indigenous community experts were actively involved.
- The activity was deeply integrated with Indigenous pedagogical approaches.
- The spiritual significance of the pole was recognized by following proper protocols and values.
Adapted from : https://opentextbc.ca/indigenizationcurriculumdevelopers/chapter/appropriate-use-of-indigenous-content/
The take-aways for us:
- Do not ask students to create art using indigenous images or symbols: totem poles, dream catchers, Haida art etc.
- Instead – think about the inspiration and work from that – indigenous communities value their elders and the animals in the environment, how might we communicate that through art?
- Traditional Haida art is often limited to three colours: white, black and red and focused on line. Can you represent an animal that you feel a connection to, using three colours of your own choice and an emphasis on line?
- Everything that we use from an indigenous origin (art, stories, realia) needs to be accredited and acknowledged. If that’s not possible – don’t use it.
- If in any doubt contact your school’s indigenous education coordinator